New song - established "progressions"

[TripleM]

The guitars sound fuller in this mix. The whole mix sounds bigger. The bass level is sitting nicely now.

[rayc]

I needed to replace a fizzy guitar on the right.
I knew which one...it took an half dozen attempts becasue I couldn't track without the fizz...
AH BUT...it was the wrong guitar I replaced...D'OH!
I then replaced the actual fizzy one.
Today I replaced my Shure 57 with an old dynamic I bought in the early 90s for very, very little mnoey. It seems to do a better job...more of the aggressive, but not fizzy, top end my recordings usually miss.
It's listed at the bottom of the O.P. with 270123.

[Lt. Bob]

like it but as greg says without a melody it's hard to tell.
I'm not sure what the brouhaha is about the chords ...... sounds like chords to me .... I hear nothing unusual at all .... yeah, a zillion other songs use such progressions ..... so what?
There's only 12 notes ..... everything has been done a zillion times.

Sounds like a good starting point

[WhiskeyJack]

Coming it late on the latest mix and i have to agree with Lt. Bob. I'm not really to worked up about an over abundance of chords. And really i am not even rgistering an over abundance of chords or a cluttered song.

Will have to wait to hear it with some vocals. This mix as it sits works for what it is.