The Tone Thread

New Guitar Day? Obsessed with tone? 10 on the volume dial not enough? Celestion vs. Electrovoice? Cum in, feel the noize.
Post Reply
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 22394
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Greg_L »

SweetDan wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 11:26 am But really, all we want to know is how the music sounds coming out of that new purple box of yours...
Lol. It will probably sound pretty much like all the other shit I do. :lollers2:
Rebel Yell
User avatar
Bubba
Posts: 3350
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 2:45 pm
Location: Checking out my haggard face in the mirror.

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Bubba »

JD01 wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 8:27 am
Greg_L wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 8:26 am Or really good.
Can you think of an example? Surely it just sounds like out of tune chaos... and not in a good way.
Joey Santiago -everything
John McGeoch - lots of stuff but particularly "Permafrost" solo
Haggard Musician :mad:
User avatar
Tadpui
Posts: 3689
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 3:50 pm

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Tadpui »

JD01 wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 8:17 am Its not a fast or tricky lead - I think the only reason I double tracked it originally was 'cos I hadn't yet discovered sticking delay on lead guitar - and now I've kind of got used to it being double tracked. No bends in it either - inaccurate bending is great for making double tracked guitar sound comically bad!
I've always loved the dual solo from No More Shoes by Stephen Malkmus & the Jicks. It's a very loose extended solo with 2 guitars that bounce between unison and doing their own thing. Actually there are 2 extended solos in that song. They're definitely not tightly doubled, and I like them a lot.

In some of Elliott Smith's later studio stuff, he did a lot of double/triple/however many tracked rhythm and solo stuff. He actually liked to tune one guitar a little sharp when doubling and panning. I think it works on his stuff, but I'm not brave enough to intentionally start knocking things out of tune. I'm thinking Coast To Coast and Amity are songs where he does that, but I'll have to go back and listen to remember for sure.
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 17233
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by JD01 »

Tadpui wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 2:49 pm
JD01 wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 8:17 am Its not a fast or tricky lead - I think the only reason I double tracked it originally was 'cos I hadn't yet discovered sticking delay on lead guitar - and now I've kind of got used to it being double tracked. No bends in it either - inaccurate bending is great for making double tracked guitar sound comically bad!
I've always loved the dual solo from No More Shoes by Stephen Malkmus & the Jicks. It's a very loose extended solo with 2 guitars that bounce between unison and doing their own thing. Actually there are 2 extended solos in that song. They're definitely not tightly doubled, and I like them a lot.

In some of Elliott Smith's later studio stuff, he did a lot of double/triple/however many tracked rhythm and solo stuff. He actually liked to tune one guitar a little sharp when doubling and panning. I think it works on his stuff, but I'm not brave enough to intentionally start knocking things out of tune. I'm thinking Coast To Coast and Amity are songs where he does that, but I'll have to go back and listen to remember for sure.
Elliott Smith was pretty much the definition of acoustic home recording genius... he could get away with that shit.
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 22394
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Greg_L »

Okay fuckers, here's the very first round of what I assume will be many many exploratory sound clips of the AB763 Deluxe Reverb kit build....which I will hereby officially name the Deluxe Retard.

This is pretty much the first that I've fired up and really pushed it.

This set of clips will feature just the "Normal Channel". No reverb or tremolo on this channel. It's just a basic no-frills channel.

This first sound clip is five little sections spanning from 2 to 10 on the volume, going by twos. First riff is on 2, second riff is on 4, third on 6, etc.

Gibson SG - My signature Mutt G90 bridge pickup :)
Deluxe Retard - Normal Channel high input - bright switch on
Volume - varied
Bass - 5
Treble - 5
Marshall 1960B 4x12 - Celestion G12H30
Senn e609 on axis, on grill, dustcap/cone seam - Shure SM57 on axis, on grill, halfway across cone
50/50 mic blend
No EQ or FX in DAW

(Clip is too big for the site upload - just right click and save as or listen in the dropbox window)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4v1aqeh1zwa29 ... 7.mp3?dl=0


And here, because why not, is a clip with a.....Strat? Fuck. It was just sitting here.
Volume on 5 for both of these clips, used low input on first clip, high input on second. Same setup as above.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/69lvro7j1oe38 ... 7.mp3?dl=0


So there's the first run through of the Normal Channel. See what you think.
Rebel Yell
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 17233
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by JD01 »

Well that was suitably epic, I really liked volume 6, but liked 8 more! By the time it got to 10 it sounded like it was starting to get a bit too mushy! Like it was properly going into meltdown.
You've gotta be really pleased with that! Sounds amazing. I reckon volume on 7 with a boost will be my favorite!
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 22394
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Greg_L »

JD01 wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 4:26 pm Well that was suitably epic, I really liked volume 6, but liked 8 more! By the time it got to 10 it sounded like it was starting to get a bit too mushy! Like it was properly going into meltdown.
You've gotta be really pleased with that! Sounds amazing. I reckon volume on 7 with a boost will be my favorite!
Thanks dude. Yeah I kind of like it best around 6-ish myself. I'm most pleased that even on 10 it behaved normally. Nothing bad or weird happened with it giving all it's got. That was pretty cool. I like the crunch in it. I didn't expect to like the Normal Channel this much. Pretty cool.

I'm gonna grab the Hallmark Mosrite clone and do the other channel next. That's what this amp is really all about.
Rebel Yell
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 17233
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by JD01 »

Greg_L wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 4:33 pm
JD01 wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 4:26 pm Well that was suitably epic, I really liked volume 6, but liked 8 more! By the time it got to 10 it sounded like it was starting to get a bit too mushy! Like it was properly going into meltdown.
You've gotta be really pleased with that! Sounds amazing. I reckon volume on 7 with a boost will be my favorite!
Thanks dude. Yeah I kind of like it best around 6-ish myself. I'm most pleased that even on 10 it behaved normally. Nothing bad or weird happened with it giving all it's got. That was pretty cool. I like the crunch in it. I didn't expect to like the Normal Channel this much. Pretty cool.

I'm gonna grab the Hallmark Mosrite clone and do the other channel next. That's what this amp is really all about.
Yeah - I couldn't decide between 6 and 8... 8 just edged it for me 'cos it was a bit more saturated without starting to flub... and I prefer The Damned.
It didn't sound bad on any of the other settings though, even on 10, while it sounded like an amp going into meltdown it didn't sound horrible like my Blackstar when I really pushed it.
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 22394
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Greg_L »

JD01 wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 4:44 pm
Yeah - I couldn't decide between 6 and 8... 8 just edged it for me 'cos it was a bit more saturated without starting to flub... and I prefer The Damned.
That was a Buzzcocks song. :smug:
Rebel Yell
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 17233
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by JD01 »

Greg_L wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 4:46 pm
JD01 wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 4:44 pm
Yeah - I couldn't decide between 6 and 8... 8 just edged it for me 'cos it was a bit more saturated without starting to flub... and I prefer The Damned.
That was a Buzzcocks song. :smug:
:spacepalm: haha, of course it was! I was singing along with it but somehow called it Elouise in my head!
User avatar
Minerman
Posts: 2022
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Minerman »

Greg_L wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 4:11 pm Okay fuckers, here's the very first round of what I assume will be many many exploratory sound clips of the AB763 Deluxe Reverb kit build....which I will hereby officially name the Deluxe Retard.

This is pretty much the first that I've fired up and really pushed it.

This set of clips will feature just the "Normal Channel". No reverb or tremolo on this channel. It's just a basic no-frills channel.

This first sound clip is five little sections spanning from 2 to 10 on the volume, going by twos. First riff is on 2, second riff is on 4, third on 6, etc.

Gibson SG - My signature Mutt G90 bridge pickup :)
Deluxe Retard - Normal Channel high input - bright switch on
Volume - varied
Bass - 5
Treble - 5
Marshall 1960B 4x12 - Celestion G12H30
Senn e609 on axis, on grill, dustcap/cone seam - Shure SM57 on axis, on grill, halfway across cone
50/50 mic blend
No EQ or FX in DAW

And here, because why not, is a clip with a.....Strat? Fuck. It was just sitting here.

Volume on 5 for both of these clips, used low input on first clip, high input on second. Same setup as above.
So there's the first run through of the Normal Channel. See what you think.
Sounds good so far dude, I know you're still learning what the amp will/won't do, but I think it suits your style pretty good...I say damn good job on the build man, seems like it's pretty quiet even when the volume is jacked up...

It doesn't have the bark & bite your other amps have, but that's the whole point of this one, right??? :smiles:

I say mission accomplished... :minernuggs:
Image
Gibson, Fender, Ibanez, Jackson
Ceriatone, Marshall, EVH
TC Electronic, MXR, Yamaha

My music @ Reverbnation :minernuggs:
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 22394
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Greg_L »

Minerman wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 5:22 pm
Sounds good so far dude, I know you're still learning what the amp will/won't do, but I think it suits your style pretty good...I say damn good job on the build man, seems like it's pretty quiet even when the volume is jacked up...

It doesn't have the bark & bite your other amps have, but that's the whole point of this one, right??? :smiles:

I say mission accomplished... :minernuggs:
Ha thanks man. No, this is not a cranked Marshall. Different animal. And this won't be a use-all-the-time amp either, but it was a good project and one I've always wanted. I'm just thrilled that it works and sounds like it should. :coolstorybro:
Rebel Yell
User avatar
muttley
Posts: 7026
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 6:33 am
Location: right here right now..
Contact:

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by muttley »

I cant count but it definitely starts to get my interest tone wise from around 2.55.....
User avatar
Minerman
Posts: 2022
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Minerman »

Greg_L wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 5:46 pm Ha thanks man. No, this is not a cranked Marshall. Different animal. And this won't be a use-all-the-time amp either, but it was a good project and one I've always wanted. I'm just thrilled that it works and sounds like it should. :coolstorybro:
Yes, a different animal was the whole point, right??? Mission accomplished dude...

To me, the Fender clean/slight breakup is just an iconic sound as the cranked Marshall roar...I bet you could throw a drive pedal in front of it & it'd sound great too...Pretty impressive watching you take all the parts out of the box, assemble it, & have tones like this...
Good job dude... :minernuggs:



I threw my EVH head & 4x12 on the chopping block again, but haven't gotten any bites on either of 'em...If I can sell both of 'em, I could get another Chupacabra, but the cab is gonna be a problem to sell IMO...It just costs so much to ship the damn thing, I don't think anyone will bother...Time will tell I suppose...I'd thought about calling a couple shops that are about an hour or so drive to see how much they'd give me for 'em, but I'd say they'd rape me like Guitar Center, so I'm not sure about doing that...

I've also been looking pretty hard at the Ceriatone Son of Yeti...From what I can tell, it's basically the Chupa pre-amp (with the era & gain switches) with 6V6 power tubes...It's also about $5-600 cheaper, but, it's a little amp...

Time will tell I suppose, but the EVH rig is basically collecting dust...I do use the cab, but I still have my Bastard 4x12, so I don't think I'd miss it, but I know I wouldn't miss the EVH head... :cuckoo:
Image
Gibson, Fender, Ibanez, Jackson
Ceriatone, Marshall, EVH
TC Electronic, MXR, Yamaha

My music @ Reverbnation :minernuggs:
User avatar
rayc
Posts: 9406
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:31 pm
Location: South of Bundaberg North of Brisbane

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by rayc »

The 1st set sound pretty cool - tones that anyone recording would be happy with if they weren't a Marshall addict. Fallin' In Love sounded spot on - and not of the FYC version.
Strat set - my that is spanky bright. That would be great for some songs.
Cheers
rayc
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 22394
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Greg_L »

muttley wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 6:20 pm I cant count but it definitely starts to get my interest tone wise from around 2.55.....
Yeah that would be "8" on the dial. I like it too. I think I liked 6 just a little better, but these are early tests. I'm really pretty happy with it all right now. It fucking works. :lollers2:
Minerman wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 6:24 pm Yes, a different animal was the whole point, right??? Mission accomplished dude...

To me, the Fender clean/slight breakup is just an iconic sound as the cranked Marshall roar...I bet you could throw a drive pedal in front of it & it'd sound great too...Pretty impressive watching you take all the parts out of the box, assemble it, & have tones like this...
Good job dude... :minernuggs:
Thanks bud. :coolstorybro:

I threw my EVH head & 4x12 on the chopping block again, but haven't gotten any bites on either of 'em...If I can sell both of 'em, I could get another Chupacabra, but the cab is gonna be a problem to sell IMO...It just costs so much to ship the damn thing, I don't think anyone will bother...Time will tell I suppose...I'd thought about calling a couple shops that are about an hour or so drive to see how much they'd give me for 'em, but I'd say they'd rape me like Guitar Center, so I'm not sure about doing that...

I've also been looking pretty hard at the Ceriatone Son of Yeti...From what I can tell, it's basically the Chupa pre-amp (with the era & gain switches) with 6V6 power tubes...It's also about $5-600 cheaper, but, it's a little amp...

Time will tell I suppose, but the EVH rig is basically collecting dust...I do use the cab, but I still have my Bastard 4x12, so I don't think I'd miss it, but I know I wouldn't miss the EVH head... :cuckoo:
Man if you didn't live in the asspit of nowhere your shit would sell fast. Just hang in there man.

I've heard good things about the Son of Yeti. I think it's maybe a little darker than the Chupa? Maybe? Maybe that's the 6V6s at work. I don't know. But if it's got the same preamp as the Chupa, that's most of the battle right there.
rayc wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 7:07 pm The 1st set sound pretty cool - tones that anyone recording would be happy with if they weren't a Marshall addict. Fallin' In Love sounded spot on - and not of the FYC version.
Strat set - my that is spanky bright. That would be great for some songs.
Thanks Ray. Yeah pretty happy with it so far. I'm even okay with the Strat clip...but it's back on the stand now for another year of neglect. :lollers2:
Rebel Yell
User avatar
liv_rong
Posts: 2074
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 7:32 pm

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by liv_rong »

I will listen once get some time in front of my monitors. Maybe this evening I hope, I want to hear this thing.
User avatar
Lt. Bob
Posts: 7658
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:02 pm

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Lt. Bob »

quick observations.

I liked high input on 5 best ..... because the point of this is a Fender type sound right?
That's what sounded most like a Fender to me.
Put a nice 'verb on that and you're squarely in blackface territory.

The clips with it being driven harder sound like someone driving a Fender hard to try and get a more marshally rock sound because they don't own a Marshall.
I can't see why anyone with all the marshalls you have would ever want that flubby Fender sound instead.

The high input on 5 though ...... that's tight up my clean alley
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 22394
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Greg_L »

Lt. Bob wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 12:59 pm quick observations.

I liked high input on 5 best ..... because the point of this is a Fender type sound right?
That's what sounded most like a Fender to me.
Put a nice 'verb on that and you're squarely in blackface territory.

The clips with it being driven harder sound like someone driving a Fender hard to try and get a more marshally rock sound because they don't own a Marshall.
I can't see why anyone with all the marshalls you have would ever want that flubby Fender sound instead.

The high input on 5 though ...... that's tight up my clean alley
Yup, this thing could never replicate or replace my Marshalls. That's not what it's for. I'm just showing what it does on that channel.
Rebel Yell
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 22394
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: The Tone Thread

Post by Greg_L »

Alrighty then....time for the business side of this amp. This is why I wanted to build this amp.

Not much direction or organization in these clips. I just stood in front of it and twiddled the dials on the Vibrato channel.

Hallmark 60 Custom - Fat Pig bridge pickup
Deluxe Retard - Vibrato channel - bright switch off
Bass and Treble - mostly around 5
Volume - all over the place
Reverb - pretty much everywhere
Tremolo - comes and goes
Marshall 1960B 4x12 - Celestion G12H30
MXL R144 ribbon mic dead center about 6" off grill
No EQ or FX in DAW. All amp, cab, mic, ears.

This first one starts pretty timid and gets a little more ridiculous at the end.
Hlmrk DR vibch G12H30 R144 1.mp3
This one goes full retard. Max reverb, a bit of big volume, and back to kind of normal.
Hlmrk DR vibch G12H30 R144 2.mp3
This one introduces the amp tremolo. Fast, slow, intense, mild...and more reverb.
Hlmrk DR vibch G12H30 R144 3.mp3
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Rebel Yell
Post Reply